The problem I have with the author's thesis is I think he puts too much faith into knee-jerk impulses. For example, he says this... "I have realized that idea

The problem I have with the author's thesis is I think he puts too much faith into knee-jerk impulses. For example, he says this... "I have realized that ideas which remain unexecuted for long periods of time, will most definetly never be executed.... The execution of an important idea is almost immidiately initiated. " The truth is there are a lot of things that can stand in the way of the immedicate execution of an impoortant idea. That doesn't mean they should be given up on. Every good idea I've had required work to execute and there have been times in my life where my job, personal life, or other circumstances didn't allow me the time to put that work in. But I didn't give up on the idea because of that and when the time came when I could execute on them I did. Ideas should be judged on their merit not on the time frame they occured to a person.