3 ms·
Banks don't have the same access to your clients that you do. Their fraud monitors are giant machine-learning racks of computers. If one were to adopt the posi
by cynicalkane 13y ago
Banks don't have the same access to your clients that you do. Their fraud monitors are giant machine-learning racks of computers.
If one were to adopt the position that it is the responsibility of business to prevent fraud, well, you have a unique ability to do that that no other institution has. This is why I think your post is hypocrisy. Banks aren't lawyers, they don't know your clients like you do, and if you adopt the principle that "people should be responsible for the actions of their customers", you're going to have a significant amount of responsibility that nobody else can handle.
- flexie 13y agoLawyers should be responsible to their clients, not serve as an extra layer of tax informants. Governments already have hundreds of thousands in their employ. And please spare your hypocracy remarks for someone you know.
- judk 13y agoLawyers are partly agents of the government. The alternative would be to make private lawyering illegal and to require all lawyer-type work to be done at goverenment offices.
- AndrewKemendo 13y agoLawyers should be responsible to their clients, not serve as an extra layer of tax informants. I was under the impression this is how it worked eg. that lawyers' only responsibility are to their client. Otherwise you would get some kind of weird conflict of interest in every case.
- moocowduckquack 13y agoIf one were to adopt the position that it is the responsibility of business to prevent fraud Well, it is the responsibility of HSBC to prevent criminal fraud by HSBC, which is one of the charges they plead guilty to in their plea bargain.