4 ms·
I hate the look of Computer Modern as well, finding its letters very thin and hard to read on mobile. I can't really convince anyone on aesthetics, but please
by MaxGabriel 13y ago
I hate the look of Computer Modern as well, finding its letters very thin and hard to read on mobile.
I can't really convince anyone on aesthetics, but please look at how the default zoom level on Mobile Safari renders many of the bold characters as having this weird double-line effect:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/enojel6ymuhfnlw/Photo%20Dec%2023%2C%2011%2056%2044%20AM.png https://www.dropbox.com/s/enojel6ymuhfnlw/Photo%20Dec%2023%2...
https://www.dropbox.com/s/gkk1aqgduka40gw/Photo%20Dec%2023%2C%2012%2009%2036%20PM.png https://www.dropbox.com/s/gkk1aqgduka40gw/Photo%20Dec%2023%2...
- mrottenkolber 13y ago> I hate the look of Computer Modern as well, finding its letters very thin and hard to read on mobile. Doesn't look any good on my screen either, but it's a print font I'd expect it to become pretty at around 210 dpi.
- twotwotwo 13y agoOof. I think that's this issue: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5069752/ios-4-2-webfont-ttf-s-bold-font-weight-rendering-bug http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5069752/ios-4-2-webfont-t... I think the problem is that none of the TTFs include bold italic, so the browser generates a 'fake bold' of the italic. This time, MobileSafari is doing it oddly. Apparently a workaround is to fake bold yourself with -webkit-text-stroke (icky) and pretty workarounds would be to avoid bold italic or have a separate .ttf for it.
- MaxGabriel 13y agoHmm, perhaps. But it also occurs on plain bold text https://www.dropbox.com/s/h2zy36l447mj8j7/Photo%20Dec%2023%2C%205%2031%2005%20PM.png https://www.dropbox.com/s/h2zy36l447mj8j7/Photo%20Dec%2023%2...
- twotwotwo 13y ago(Might be that the .ttf didn't have CM Roman bold either, then.)