The proposal is foolish because it would impact a substantial number of businesses? I don't understand the logic: if it impacted few or no businesses, then it

The proposal is foolish because it would impact a substantial number of businesses? I don't understand the logic: if it impacted few or no businesses, then it would be pointless. Since it is impactful, then it is foolish? Recall that I gave a timeline of some two decades for phased implementation. Also note that a franchise model could serve many retail stores well. Subway sandwich shops are roughly as numerous as McDonalds, but the corporations themselves have nowhere near the same number of employees. A franchise model could be used for roughly half the companies in your list. Isn't it more foolish to have dozens of companies that would destroy large parts of the country if something went really wrong with them? Haven't we learned that lesson by now?