> The worst critiscm you can level here is that a lowly-paid cashier was insufficiently trained to spot potentially dubious sources of cash that were being paid

> The worst critiscm you can level here is that a lowly-paid cashier was insufficiently trained to spot potentially dubious sources of cash that were being paid in. It seems like the frequency with which this was happening would suggest this could not have been hard to detect. Can we really blame this on a single lowly paid cashier? Am i missing something, or does this sound more like multiple cashiers taking comical cash deposits over a very long period? Why should this lean toward being hard to detect and not willful ignorance and thus willful assistance?