3 ms·
I agree. This is ignoring the fact that there are hundreds of languages we don't know about and probably millions of texts unaccounted for lost through the ages
by mitchellh 17y ago
I agree. This is ignoring the fact that there are hundreds of languages we don't know about and probably millions of texts unaccounted for lost through the ages.
- wlievens 17y ago... which are all probably not relevant in scale. It's like the "how many humans ever lived?" question. People immediately start discussing about the definition of a "human being", homo whatever. I say it's pretty much irrelevant to the final number.