> we're talking about pushing back retirement until 90 or maybe 95 right? This is the first thing I thought about when reading the article. It sounds like the

> we're talking about pushing back retirement until 90 or maybe 95 right? This is the first thing I thought about when reading the article. It sounds like the dream of countries like Japan where retirement is costing a lot of money. I'd love to read the comment of an economist (or a sociologist) on this.