Wow, I don't want to steer this discussion into the "ye olde golden HN days" territory, but this is the lowest of the low I have read on HN recently. Really? Y

Wow, I don't want to steer this discussion into the "ye olde golden HN days" territory, but this is the lowest of the low I have read on HN recently. Really? You dismiss a scientific claim because you, YOU cannot understand it? There's a scientific paper written by a security researcher (who by the way co-invented RSA) that goes into great detail explaining what's going on. There's data to analyse. People can try to replicate the results. Do you have anything to say about the paper? There have been a few threads about this already. What I have learned from those, and from other threads where a paper is discussed, is that practically nobody who comments has read the paper.