3 ms·
Obligatory JSON and hstore in Postgres comment.
by mwhite 13y ago
Obligatory JSON and hstore in Postgres comment.
- est 13y agostable version, every value is string. No atomic incremental operations, no nesting, shitty index.
- mwhite 13y agoJSON has non-string values and nesting. [1] I read somewhere that nesting in hstore is coming in the next version (Q3 2014?) and non-string types are on deck. Compared to the nightmarish development workflows and processes I've had to deal with resulting from using CouchDB as a main datastore, having to get the entire JSON value in order to update one key seems like not that big of a deal. What NoSQL databases even let you do incremental operations in that sense? Shitty index? It seems like you should be able to make an index on a value inside the JSON just as easily as any other index. Then maybe some advanced features of Postgres can really shine: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/indexes-bitmap-scans.html http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/indexes-bitmap-sca... https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Index-only_scans https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Index-only_scans I'm also exploring a solution for abstracting that as a normal, non-JSON table for semi-structured data using views. Basically, it seems like for semi-structured data where you know what the schema is, but maybe it just changes over time or isn't 100% certain, so it's not possible to store it using a typical schema, JSON + indexes + views offers the best of both worlds. [1] http://clarkdave.net/2013/06/what-can-you-do-with-postgresql-and-json/ http://clarkdave.net/2013/06/what-can-you-do-with-postgresql...