> In their eyes, the protocol was perfectly secure and most of it is of course. That there is exactly the problem. There is no reason to believe the protocol i

> In their eyes, the protocol was perfectly secure and most of it is of course. That there is exactly the problem. There is no reason to believe the protocol is secure, and when looking at crypto you start from the assumption that it's "maybe broken", not "perfectly secure". Assuming that some new crypto is secure is hubris.