4 ms·

CDC - Estimates of new HIV infections in the United States

14 points by yapcguy 13y ago

capkutay 13y ago
Interesting...but I don't think hacker news is the right place to share this type of article.
- popularopinion 13y ago
  It's not irrelevant. Look through the HN guidelines [1]. Articles like this are definitely acceptable. - Hacker News Guidelines - What to Submit On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity. [1] http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- jzwinck 13y ago
  I actually think this particular article is not very good (see my top-level comment). However, this topic is one of the most important issues facing younger adults today. If the logical thinking, cold rationality, problem solving, and technical skills of this community can be applied to dealing with diseases like HIV, malaria, etc., it seems worth encouraging.
yetanotherphd 13y ago
That is some of the most racist, homophobic garbage I have seen. Which shitlord funded this study? Probably the Koch brothers.
- refurb 13y ago
  Please explain why you felt the study was racist and homophobic. Was it simply because it categorized new infections by race and sexual orientation? I'm not sure I understand.
- deleted 13y ago
  [deleted]
jzwinck 13y ago
I was surprised to see black heterosexual women ahead of any group other than homosexual men--and by a large margin. I wondered why this would be. Some ideas: 1) Black heterosexual women are more likely to have sex with black heterosexual men, who are in turn more likely to have HIV (according to the same data). The black male population has fewer cases than the females, but this might be reconciled by noting that male-to-female transmission is more likely than the reverse. 2) Perhaps the bigger risk factor for heterosexual women is not being black, but being poor. TFA does not include a breakdown by socioeconomics. Or perhaps, the risk factor for women is being part of a community with a high rate of male imprisonment. Related to the above, it seems that male-to-female transmission during sex is more likely then the reverse in high-income countries like the US, but this does not hold in low-income countries. So that raises another question of why. See http://www.aidsmap.com/Estimated-risk-per-exposure/page/1324038/ http://www.aidsmap.com/Estimated-risk-per-exposure/page/1324... There are a whole bunch of possibilities, and I don't claim to know which are most true, but presenting a simple graph that says black women get HIV a lot seems a little...not helpful? Edited to add: I dug up a study from three years ago by the very same CDC which specifically says it's poverty more than race that matters. So why are they publishing charts that highlight race and ignore poverty? See here: http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/povertyandhivpressrelease.html http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/povertyandhivpressreleas...
- smtddr 13y ago
  >>Perhaps the bigger risk factor for heterosexual women is not being black, but being poor. I'm confident you're correct; this has everything to do with being poor/middle-class/rich than race. But you can't see people's net-worth as easily as physical features so we continue to publish studies grouping people by race. I mean really, as if HIV is just waiting to get me because of my brown skin...
  - refurb 13y ago
    What would be the drivers? Lack of education about safe sex habits? Other than that, I'm not sure why socioeconomic status would be so correlated with new infections.
lvh 13y ago
The article doesn't really seem to mention what IDU/MSM mean: MSM: Men who have Sex with Men IDU: Injection Drug Users The reasons why these people are at extra risk should be obvious :)

14 points by yapcguy 13y ago

capkutay 13y ago

Interesting...but I don't think hacker news is the right place to share this type of article.

popularopinion 13y ago
It's not irrelevant. Look through the HN guidelines [1]. Articles like this are definitely acceptable. - Hacker News Guidelines - What to Submit On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity. [1] http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
jzwinck 13y ago
I actually think this particular article is not very good (see my top-level comment). However, this topic is one of the most important issues facing younger adults today. If the logical thinking, cold rationality, problem solving, and technical skills of this community can be applied to dealing with diseases like HIV, malaria, etc., it seems worth encouraging.

yetanotherphd 13y ago

That is some of the most racist, homophobic garbage I have seen. Which shitlord funded this study? Probably the Koch brothers.

refurb 13y ago
Please explain why you felt the study was racist and homophobic. Was it simply because it categorized new infections by race and sexual orientation? I'm not sure I understand.
deleted 13y ago
[deleted]

jzwinck 13y ago

I was surprised to see black heterosexual women ahead of any group other than homosexual men--and by a large margin. I wondered why this would be. Some ideas: 1) Black heterosexual women are more likely to have sex with black heterosexual men, who are in turn more likely to have HIV (according to the same data). The black male population has fewer cases than the females, but this might be reconciled by noting that male-to-female transmission is more likely than the reverse. 2) Perhaps the bigger risk factor for heterosexual women is not being black, but being poor. TFA does not include a breakdown by socioeconomics. Or perhaps, the risk factor for women is being part of a community with a high rate of male imprisonment. Related to the above, it seems that male-to-female transmission during sex is more likely then the reverse in high-income countries like the US, but this does not hold in low-income countries. So that raises another question of why. See http://www.aidsmap.com/Estimated-risk-per-exposure/page/1324038/ http://www.aidsmap.com/Estimated-risk-per-exposure/page/1324... There are a whole bunch of possibilities, and I don't claim to know which are most true, but presenting a simple graph that says black women get HIV a lot seems a little...not helpful? Edited to add: I dug up a study from three years ago by the very same CDC which specifically says it's poverty more than race that matters. So why are they publishing charts that highlight race and ignore poverty? See here: http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/povertyandhivpressrelease.html http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/povertyandhivpressreleas...

smtddr 13y ago
>>Perhaps the bigger risk factor for heterosexual women is not being black, but being poor. I'm confident you're correct; this has everything to do with being poor/middle-class/rich than race. But you can't see people's net-worth as easily as physical features so we continue to publish studies grouping people by race. I mean really, as if HIV is just waiting to get me because of my brown skin...
- refurb 13y ago
  What would be the drivers? Lack of education about safe sex habits? Other than that, I'm not sure why socioeconomic status would be so correlated with new infections.

lvh 13y ago

The article doesn't really seem to mention what IDU/MSM mean: MSM: Men who have Sex with Men IDU: Injection Drug Users The reasons why these people are at extra risk should be obvious :)