3 ms·
However, European privacy directives contain explicit exemptions for many governmental organizations, including the EU itself, national security, taxation, and
by cinquemb 13y ago
However, European privacy directives contain explicit exemptions for many governmental organizations, including the EU itself, national security, taxation, and policing, and would not have protected citizens against the abuses suffered at the hands of fascist or communist governments
It's interesting to compare: in the US, corporate databases == good , government databases == bad, and it appears the exact opposite in the EU. Then there's this:
EU directives are addressed to the member states, and aren't legally binding for citizens in principle. The member states must transpose the directive into internal law. Directive 95/46/EC on the protection of personal data had to be transposed by the end of 1998. All member states have enacted their own data protection legislation.
Which just makes me think from where we are today, neither approach seems to be ok for the avg person, on top of the behaviors and incentives for individuals/companies/governments aren't lining up. What's going to give for something to fall which ever way (or is there really anything to give way at all)?
- ams6110 13y agoThe problem is we're also learning corporate databases == government databases.
- cinquemb 13y agoSeeing as corporations are pretty much legal entities created by states, (whether they be the US or EU states, or anywhere else for that matter) which allow for privileges for those who run them based on the state where incorporated, that doesn't seem to change the status quo. To me, that just makes this all look like some kind of grandstanding to placate those on the sidelines, and if we are honest with ourselves, most of whom will continue to use (and be used by) such services which leads me back to my question…