7 ms·
I haven't seen this idea anywhere, but it'd be great if Namecoin hindered domain squatters. One way you could hinder them is geometrically increasing cost of r
by jyu 13y ago
I haven't seen this idea anywhere, but it'd be great if Namecoin hindered domain squatters.
One way you could hinder them is geometrically increasing cost of registering additional domains from existing accounts.
Examples:
- Adam wants to set up his personal site. It costs him X to register.
- Bob wants to set up his personal site, and 3 hobby sites. It costs him X + 2X + 4X + 8X = 15X or (2^4 - 1)X.
- Carl the domain squatter wants to register 100 domains. It costs him (2^100 - 1)X. This could be defeated by changing Carl's business name, or other details, which creates extra hassles for him.
Edit: Didn't know that registering new accounts is near 0 effort. Guess that nixes this idea.
- eof 13y agonamecoin attempted to hinder domain squatters by charging less and less per domain overtime; where the first domains cost a lot of namecoin, and now they are very cheap. The problem was only that the the adoption was too slow to for this to have had a big effect. edit: the notion of "existing accounts" is broken here; "new accounts" are free/cheap and not related to identities.
- GigabyteCoin 13y agoimho that approach would have worked if they had implemented merged mining before implementing namecoin. That's somewhat of a moronic statement considering the namecoin crew invented the idea of merged mining. But I digress... I remember back when namecoin came out... they started the difficulty at 512 instead of 1 (bitcoin's initial difficulty) which made sense at the time, because GPUs were everywhere by then. But with namecoin being so new (and worthless) the difficulty soon dropped to the ~200 range, and anybody with a few GPUs could literally mine 1,000s of NMC per day. Case in point, the 50 NMC they charged for the first domains was still much too cheap. One could theoretically mine with an average rig for 1 week and register a few hundred of the first domains available.
- dangero 13y agoThere is no way to stop people from having multiple accounts.
- jaredsohn 13y agoCouldn't you limit it based on credit card number, a corresponding phone number, a Facebook ID, verified address, etc.? Even if it doesn't fully limit it, it perhaps makes it harder.
- rdmckenzie 13y agoNo. That would defeat the entire user model, which is purpsoefully derived from Bitcoin's anonymity structure.
- lukifer 13y agoTo be pedantic, BitCoin (and most other cryptocoins) are pseudonymous, not anonymous. But yes, one user can have multiple pseudonyms.
- cantfindmypass 13y agoThat would require trusted centralized verification.