His argument is that WASPs were men of "character"? What a load of tripe. I honestly cannot believe this is being published in the WSJ, an article wanting for

His argument is that WASPs were men of "character"? What a load of tripe. I honestly cannot believe this is being published in the WSJ, an article wanting for a return to hereditary rule (not that it's gone far from that, but still). Awful, awful things. I, for one , look forward to the last time that people try to use a "standards" argument in deciding things. An interview with the Prime Minister of Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0S2NKlMW0vc#t=1059 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0S2NKlMW0vc#t=1059 "All that we say is lets have some standards, in decency , in behavior , and in civilisation" , this is the argument to justify not giving 95% of the population franchise in elections. The more I hear people talk, the more I feel that "moral standards" and "decency" are arguments that are only used to enforce some existing (usually racist) plutocracy.