3 ms·
How can a system that costs more for less coverage and poorer access to treatment be better than what we had before? RTFA! What we had before had plenty of pro
by cynwoody 13y ago
How can a system that costs more for less coverage and poorer access to treatment be better than what we had before? RTFA!
What we had before had plenty of problems, but Obamacare is a failure from the get-go, leaving aside the $600+m web site debacle.
- hga 13y ago"and poorer access to treatment" One critical thing about what I gather is the vast majority of plans is that their provider networks are narrow since the insurance companies were pressured hard to lower costs (we've all read about how many quality hospitals have been outright excluded). So narrow that routine medicine outside of your county or local area is out-of-network and entirely uncovered. This is going to have some serious effects on those who've retired but have not yet reached the 65 year old threshold for Medicare and have a second home, e.g. snowbirds who want to avoid harsh northern winters: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/12/more_obamacare_devastation.html http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/12/more_obamacare_devast...