4 ms·
only thing lacking chrome is the plugin support and support for RSS feeds. come on! google, that should have been there from day one!
by omnipresent1 17y ago
only thing lacking chrome is the plugin support and support for RSS feeds. come on! google, that should have been there from day one!
- _giu 17y agothey held the extension system back possibly because it could have been a bottleneck or because they just didn't want to give you the possibility to use an extension that blocks their ads. however, they are working on the extension system (http://dev.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/extensions http://dev.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/extensio...) and you can already start creating your own extensions (http://dev.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/extensions/howto http://dev.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/extensio... or http://dev.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/extensions/samples http://dev.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/extensio...).
- 10ren 17y agoWhoa, you're right... they don't want adblock. I don't see any google ads these days. Not even on google search... (occasionally in gmail's webclips). Could it be... that not having adblock is a major motivation for google chrome/OS? I suspect the market share of adblock is relatively small, but it's the kind of thing that can only grow... and unlike anything else that has been discussed, adblock directly threatens revenue.
- raheemm 17y agoI think they are holding back on plugins because this is what causes the various speed bottlenecks that FF is suffering from. Plugins are nice until they slow down the browser.
- eru 17y agoYeah. Firefox needs (soft) realtime [1] plugins. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-time_computing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-time_computing