4 ms·
Are you sure about that? It's hard to find benchmarks, but things seem to point in the direction of fastcopy still being faster. See e.g. http://www.sepago.de
by cpbotha 13y ago
Are you sure about that?
It's hard to find benchmarks, but things seem to point in the direction of fastcopy still being faster.
See e.g. http://www.sepago.de/e/helge/2011/05/17/fastcopy-free-file-copy-tool-runs-circles-around-explorer http://www.sepago.de/e/helge/2011/05/17/fastcopy-free-file-c... (robocopy comparison at the end)
Would be great to see benchmarks of course! :)
- eps 13y agoYeah, positive. Just ran a quick test copying 3GB .iso from local HDD to USB3 drive. fastcopy - 152 sec (average of 3 fastest runs out of 4) robocopy - 65 sec Incidentaly, tried the same with my backup program and it's 62 seconds, faster than both.