2 ms·
Yeah, I was getting a bit ahead of myself there. Fair enough. Also, Firefox. But still: > So yes, I'd say that the above group probably does have access to $5
by PavlovsCat 13y ago
Yeah, I was getting a bit ahead of myself there. Fair enough. Also, Firefox.
But still:
> So yes, I'd say that the above group probably does have access to $5.
This doesn't mean it's not still a week's of income for where they're from, and money missed dearly. Even if it's not the "the top priority", which I never claimed, I find shrugging it off because it's (supposedly) not a problem for anyone in the first world a bit meh. Would it still deter driveby spammers if it cost 3$? 2$? Are there other ways to ensure this? To not even go further because "meh, just five bucks", kinda sucks. On the other hand, it's also stupid to tell Google how much to charge, let them suck :P