The op was successful because the analysis was accurate unlike yours. As I stated below, the article more or less claims the author has magical supper powers.

The op was successful because the analysis was accurate unlike yours. As I stated below, the article more or less claims the author has magical supper powers. He overcomes the great internal struggle (with some help from the great expert) and ultimately chooses to use his powers for the good of the world. The comment isn't transformative when the article is taken at face value- self aggrandizing.