3 ms·
Except no one wants to even peer review or try to replicate this guy's experiments, because a) they're flawed and b) they're batshit insane. The conclusions he
by warfangle 13y ago
Except no one wants to even peer review or try to replicate this guy's experiments, because a) they're flawed and b) they're batshit insane.
The conclusions he draws are -way- out there. It's like newton comparing the dropping of two objects and their rate of fall, and saying the penny drops at the same rate as the bowling ball because the penny thinks faster. Complete disconnect between results and hypothesis.
He's saying "look, their behavior changes over time (even this is disputable)! Without the chicks talking to each other! IT MUST BE PSYCHIC." God of the gaps, and all that.