I'd just prefer that we stick to the main point -- that the "anarchists"' actions were basically thuggish and coercive in nature, that is to say, anything but "

I'd just prefer that we stick to the main point -- that the "anarchists"' actions were basically thuggish and coercive in nature, that is to say, anything but "anarchistic." Anything else (e.g. speculation as to their education or class background) is a distraction from what should be the key takeaway here. But overall, fair enough, and thanks for the clarifying edit.