5 ms·
>The nature of the laws would have to change significantly as the court found the entire foundation behind the laws (largely moralizing/restricting the actions
by VladRussian2 13y ago
>The nature of the laws would have to change significantly as the court found the entire foundation behind the laws (largely moralizing/restricting the actions of others based upon personal values) unconstitutional.
following that logic most laws would be unconstitutional.
- chebucto 13y agoexamples, please
- jsmeaton 13y agoI would imagine some examples would be: - personal drug use (of any kind) - bans on same-sex marriage (which I just looked up, and seems to be legal in Canada anyway) - any form of gun control I'm not saying that I do or do not think the above should be legal, but they all are examples of "we know what's best for you". I think that's what the GP commenter was alluding to.
- throwaway2048 13y agoall of these have been ruled unconstitutional by the Canadian supreme court at one point or another.