>On other side many people lost unemployment support, because they refused to work in brothel as cleaners or maintenance personnel. It's my understanding that

>On other side many people lost unemployment support, because they refused to work in brothel as cleaners or maintenance personnel. It's my understanding that what you've said is a myth. In any case, all reasonable social security policies have a "ethical objection clause", e.g. people can't be forced to work in occupations that they ethically object to - and this should mean that social security should be impossible to lose for refusal of employment.