4 ms·

I think the comparison to type classes is specious and ends there. They look similar but they tackle very different problems. You've actually explained why rath

I think the comparison to type classes is specious and ends there. They look similar but they tackle very different problems. You've actually explained why rather well. > Not really. The regulars in #haskell - now they are frigging smart. Don't sell yourself short.

Peaker 13y ago
It seems to me type classes have a superset of the features of CL multimethods. Why not compare them?