3 ms·
Let's assume we live in the ideal world where source code, raw data, analysis pipelines, and processed data are accessible with a paper. In practice, do you thi
by cing 13y ago
Let's assume we live in the ideal world where source code, raw data, analysis pipelines, and processed data are accessible with a paper. In practice, do you think that graduate students and professors will have time to review this information and reinterpret the data? When I read or peer review a paper from a lab that I know produces good quality research, I wouldn't dare waste my time reviewing such information. I know in principle, sharing everything sounds nice, but it would drastically slow down the progress of science.
- qwerta 13y agoSomeone may review it in 1 or 10 years or maybe even in 1000 years. In future the review could be even automated. Even I could write robot which looks for mistakes in source code. Incorrect widely accepted study can cause lot of damage. I think share-everything is the only long term sustainable way.