Thanks for your feedback, Jake - and your note on the improved browser support, that's good to know. I stand corrected. > Having one library to rule them all d

Thanks for your feedback, Jake - and your note on the improved browser support, that's good to know. I stand corrected. > Having one library to rule them all doesn't drive things forward, a good example of this is when IE6 was the only major browser, browser development stagnated. I think that's a poor analogy. Everything stagnated because no one could improve upon IE 6 - it was a proprietary browser which had no way to add in new functionality. This is very different from an Open Source project run by a community of people and companies interested in seeing it improve and strive. > You mention you communicated with us? I'm not aware of this at all. I had talked with a member of the team at some post-@Media event (I think it was @Media Ajax, maybe @Media proper). Maybe I'm mis-remembering who exactly but I've definitely chatted with a few people at the BBC about jQuery and Glow. > Sizzle in Glow 2.0, although it's a bit vague about which browsers it intends to support. Would be great to know the details! What I mentioned in the post still stands: It supports at least as many browsers as jQuery does. I'm absolutely open to accepting patches to fix any deficiencies in older browsers (same goes for jQuery as well!). I'd love to see Glow utilize Sizzle, definitely contact me if you have any questions or concerns.