4 ms·
I am entirely uncertain of why this was downmodded. The _s functions are part of the C standard (Annex K), and truly are better replacements for their counterpa
by BudVVeezer 13y ago
I am entirely uncertain of why this was downmodded. The _s functions are part of the C standard (Annex K), and truly are better replacements for their counterparts. It's unfortunate that the glibc maintainers have shown so little interest in implementing this (optional, to be fair) part of the standard.
- tobiasu 13y agoBecause the argument why they are "stupid" is missing entirely. Much of the second paragraph was edited in later.