Isn't the point that strlcpy/cat are a better alternative to strncpy/cat, since the latter don't let you know at all that you didn't copy the entire string? And

Isn't the point that strlcpy/cat are a better alternative to strncpy/cat, since the latter don't let you know at all that you didn't copy the entire string? And of course, past simple use cases, one would write one's own string library based on strlcpy/cat (for whatever cases in which it's not ok to include string length in the string struct).