Whups, yes, of course you are right. Thank you! Note that I made this dumb error in three places (two obvious, one more subtle, I'll leave it to the intereste

Whups, yes, of course you are right. Thank you! Note that I made this dumb error in three places (two obvious, one more subtle, I'll leave it to the interested reader to see where). But my overall critique of his analysis of radix sort is, I believe, unaffected.