4 ms·

thats really harsh. playing the experience card is poor form and fallacious - also it wouldn't surprise me if that commenter is speaking from extensive experie

by jheriko 13y ago

thats really harsh. playing the experience card is poor form and fallacious - also it wouldn't surprise me if that commenter is speaking from extensive experience. i don't mention my 20 years of experience or background as a AAA game dev having touched every speciality with experience in high volume web and database environments, financial data quality software, language compilers and interpreters or anything like that... its next to worthless vs. what i can do, demonstrate or explain.

rantanplan 13y ago
Yes it is harsh, in the same style of the parent comment. Actually you're wrong on the experience card, for only one reason. What I mentioned is experience gained that everyone will gain, just by staying long enough in the game. Not because, I am super cool and worked in positions that few people can work. It's the same thing, like when we were teenagers and we thought that we were right in every freaking thing and our parents just responded "wait until you grow up". Well they were right in most of the things, weren't they? Were they super smart? Was it relevant if they were? Nope, they just stayed long enough in the "game". Same thing here.
- jheriko 13y ago
  i dunno, i like your example of parents. my experience of that was definitely learning just how naive and unprepared for everything they were... i don't rate experience highly at all. quality of experience and what you learn from it is what adds value to that 'time served'. plenty of old men will still dance even though they have been terrible at it for 50 years. they have had a lot of practice, but they still suck. there are ample examples like this
  - rantanplan 13y ago
    I agree with what you say and I find it quite orthogonal to what I said :) You also gave an interesting example. Dancing is a specialized activity. Thus specialized talent and/or quality experience is required. But not all people go dancing. So I wouldn't quite include it in the set of common experiences that most people will go through in their lives.

by jheriko 13y ago

rantanplan 13y ago

Yes it is harsh, in the same style of the parent comment. Actually you're wrong on the experience card, for only one reason. What I mentioned is experience gained that everyone will gain, just by staying long enough in the game. Not because, I am super cool and worked in positions that few people can work. It's the same thing, like when we were teenagers and we thought that we were right in every freaking thing and our parents just responded "wait until you grow up". Well they were right in most of the things, weren't they? Were they super smart? Was it relevant if they were? Nope, they just stayed long enough in the "game". Same thing here.

jheriko 13y ago
i dunno, i like your example of parents. my experience of that was definitely learning just how naive and unprepared for everything they were... i don't rate experience highly at all. quality of experience and what you learn from it is what adds value to that 'time served'. plenty of old men will still dance even though they have been terrible at it for 50 years. they have had a lot of practice, but they still suck. there are ample examples like this
- rantanplan 13y ago
  I agree with what you say and I find it quite orthogonal to what I said :) You also gave an interesting example. Dancing is a specialized activity. Thus specialized talent and/or quality experience is required. But not all people go dancing. So I wouldn't quite include it in the set of common experiences that most people will go through in their lives.