3 ms·

There is zero ambiguity in the PG quote > Strictly speaking I should have killed the post entirely And this was 9 months ago. We are left to assume that the

by sheetjs 13y ago

There is zero ambiguity in the PG quote > Strictly speaking I should have killed the post entirely And this was 9 months ago. We are left to assume that the policy was enforced (after all, if the post were killed, it wouldn't show up in a search). And even in this thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6931168 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6931168 > I've been keeping my mouth shut here about Coinbase after starting that thread 9 months ago. I wouldn't be surprised to hear others echo the same sentiment (concern about expressing grievances about Coinbase) especially after PG's responses in the original conversation. Others in the original thread refuted the argument you are presenting, so I recommend you start https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5428757 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5428757 before rehashing arguments that have already been addressed

jessedhillon 13y ago
Sign #1 that should have given you pause: in order to disprove your assertion a person would need to prove a negative, i.e., prove that no criticism was nullified. If you don't see what the problem is here, you may need a course in critical thinking.
- sheetjs 13y ago
  (pointing to the statement that HN is not a support forum) + (commenting that PG should have killed the thread) = (PG is likely to kill all threads that may seem like support requests) Given that many defenders of coinbase, including PG, are seeing support requests as criticisms, (threads that criticize coinbase = threads that seem like support requests) in their heads. Therefore, (pointing to the statement that HN is not a support forum) + (commenting that PG should have killed the thread) = (PG is likely to kill all threads that may seem like support requests) = (PG is likely to kill all threads that criticize coinbase)

3 ms·

There is zero ambiguity in the PG quote > Strictly speaking I should have killed the post entirely And this was 9 months ago. We are left to assume that the

by sheetjs 13y ago

jessedhillon 13y ago
Sign #1 that should have given you pause: in order to disprove your assertion a person would need to prove a negative, i.e., prove that no criticism was nullified. If you don't see what the problem is here, you may need a course in critical thinking.
- sheetjs 13y ago
  (pointing to the statement that HN is not a support forum) + (commenting that PG should have killed the thread) = (PG is likely to kill all threads that may seem like support requests) Given that many defenders of coinbase, including PG, are seeing support requests as criticisms, (threads that criticize coinbase = threads that seem like support requests) in their heads. Therefore, (pointing to the statement that HN is not a support forum) + (commenting that PG should have killed the thread) = (PG is likely to kill all threads that may seem like support requests) = (PG is likely to kill all threads that criticize coinbase)