3 ms·
Excluding an entity like the NSA, who cares nothing for $200,000 (literally a rounding error in their budget), but everything for the information available for
by jnbiche 13y ago
Excluding an entity like the NSA, who cares nothing for $200,000 (literally a rounding error in their budget), but everything for the information available for the taking.
- loganu 13y agoWhile I agree with your point, immediately jumping to the NSA and their bottomless pool of resources and talent is kind of the new Godwin's law. Logan's law: In any given discussion tangentially related to security, the thing presented as "secure" will be soon declared "definitely not secure"... because...NSA.
- jnbiche 13y agoI actually agree with the motivation behind your argument -- it's ridiculous to pull out unknown NSA capabilities as a foil to every crypto argument. I just wanted to point out that there were times when money was not a very good motivator for someone who could break a given encryption system.
- capnjngl 13y agoSnowden's Law