3 ms·
>> costs of compliance for a full-time employee I'm not sure this is the driver. Instead, the primary factor is likely the fact that hourly employees cost a 50
by runako 13y ago
>> costs of compliance for a full-time employee
I'm not sure this is the driver. Instead, the primary factor is likely the fact that hourly employees cost a 50% more the moment they cross 40 hours in a week.
>> Google would rather hire 15 guys at 40-60 hours instead of 40 guys at 20 hours
Not if they are paid hourly, they wouldn't. It would just be throwing money away.
In my way-back days working hourly jobs in retail/fast food/etc., we would game this by trying to get as many excess hours as possible early in the week, so that we could get to 40+ hours by the 5th/6th day. Then, we'd aggressively try to get extra shifts from people who called in sick, etc. But management always tried to prevent this.
- altoz 13y agoOvertime laws definitely affect the cliff at 40 hours. That said, there's something to be said for reliable and consistent employees. I know that a lot of small business owners I know would rather have a few trusted employees than many not-as-trustworthy ones. There's a trust cost to adding each additional employee that may or may not offset the overtime costs.