4 ms·
"He wasted valuable city resources on an experiment the outcome of which he should have predicted, being a criminal attorney in Roxbury." No. He used city reso
by alan_cx 13y ago
"He wasted valuable city resources on an experiment the outcome of which he should have predicted, being a criminal attorney in Roxbury."
No. He used city resources to audit a city activity buy running an experiment to prove a hypothesis.
This "should of predicted" point is bullshit. Its like those people who say, "So what about NSA spying, we (smart arses) knew all along". Well, no they didn't. The thought they knew, but they did not know until it was proved with the Snowden leaks. Like wise this prediction you expected this person to make.
To many people think they know things then really they dont, they just believe them, and they cant know anything until its proved. This guy proved it.
OK, my use of the word "prove" is probably going a little too far, but you get my drift. He has at least added to a body of evidence. Which is a damn good use of city money.
As for the reaction of the authorities, well that is a disgrace. Presumably this guy is a local tax payer, and there for paying for these authorities. He has every right to discover if he and his fellow tax payers are getting value for money.