The previous comments already identify this as a poorly reasoned post. I read it anyway, and I have to agree. Why don't we upvote submissions that have more evi

The previous comments already identify this as a poorly reasoned post. I read it anyway, and I have to agree. Why don't we upvote submissions that have more evidence behind them, as the The Hacker News welcome message[1] implicitly suggests? "A crap link is one that's only superficially interesting. Stories on HN don't have to be about hacking, because good hackers aren't only interested in hacking, but they do have to be deeply interesting." [1] http://ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html http://ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html