When I see companies advertising poor real-world ways of engineering, it just makes me think of the documents I make on my projects showing code made by some en

When I see companies advertising poor real-world ways of engineering, it just makes me think of the documents I make on my projects showing code made by some engineers and how a solution could have been made in half the code (or less), more clearly, more abstracted, more efficient, and fewer bugs. Do these people use dumb interview questions like asking people to list c language trigraphs? Sure, someone that knows it might be a good programmer, but they might also write obfuscated piles of crap that cause bugs since they over complicate problems.