4 ms·
Are you implying that Uber has no impact on the shape and nature of the market of taxi cabs and drivers in the cities they serve? Because that seems pretty har
by knowtheory 13y ago
Are you implying that Uber has no impact on the shape and nature of the market of taxi cabs and drivers in the cities they serve?
Because that seems pretty hard to swallow given how much people crow about Uber disrupting markets.
Uber does help define the landscape of drivers and availability. There are other sorts of pricing models they could even follow. Why not charge a little bit more during off peak times, and then turn around and incentivize drivers using the subsidy from off-peak hours, rather than dumping it all on individuals traveling during points of tumult/crisis?
There are a lot of models between the awful medallion system many cities have and the way that Uber works right now. And frankly as much as i hate how taxis work in a lot of US cities, and as much as i love the user experience that Uber delivers, they certainly should not be immune to criticism, especially over issues like this.
- dangrossman 13y agoHe said nature, not the nature of markets. Winter storms, which Uber doesn't control just yet.
- jowiar 13y ago> Why not charge a little bit more during off peak times, and then turn around and incentivize drivers using the subsidy from off-peak hours, rather than dumping it all on individuals traveling during points of tumult/crisis? Because someone else would start up with a pricing model of charging less during off-peak hours, providing no service whatsoever during weather situations, and the pricing model would fail. It can be done at the government level - tax cab rides, then use the proceeds to subsidize those at other times, but it can't reasonably be done by one company unilaterally. The medallion system sort of does this, by fixing both price and supply. It's probably suboptimal, though.
- abrown28 13y agoIf it's fixing both price and supply then it is guaranteed to be suboptimal