3 ms·
in part because politicians force train operators to operate a comprehensive schedule, not just when it's economically viable. I assume that's because the fewe
by Goronmon 13y ago
in part because politicians force train operators to operate a comprehensive schedule, not just when it's economically viable.
I assume that's because the fewer trains there are over the course of a day (or weekend), the harder it is for people to use the train as a substitute for personal transportation and the less likely people will rely on the trains in general.
- mseebach 13y agoYeah, in theory, and possible also in some practices, but you also end up with an impenetrable mesh of cross-subsidies that raise the cost of some routes that might be economical in their own regard to subsidise other links but not enough to make them solid alternatives. And then suddenly you have to compete with low-cost airlines and bus services that don't have this subsidy complexity and are much more agile - recipe for disaster.