3 ms·
Option A - Give money to your children (as much of it as you can). Option B - Give money to a government who spends $5 to be able to spend $1. Then waistes tha
by powertower 13y ago
Option A - Give money to your children (as much of it as you can).
Option B - Give money to a government who spends $5 to be able to spend $1. Then waistes that $1 (on polices that you don't agree with).
Option C - Give money to people who hate you for having money (a.k.a "trickle it down", "guaranteed minimal income", "anyone off the street can be a CEO", "lets retroactivly tax the rich", etc).
I know what I would do.
- swalkergibson 13y agoOption D - Sign the giving pledge and stop being concerned that your children can't live on less than 8 billion dollars.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- wavefunction 13y agoOption D - Get merc'd when the rest of us have had enough. Option E - Realize that we have enough food and resources so that noone should have to do without, and create a society that reflects that. Funny how these last two options contain the one option that will solve this problem permanently, and the one option that humanity always ends up at.
- powertower 13y agoSo your options are to - 1. Murder them out of spite. 2. Make them shelter and feed the poor of the world, so the poor multiplies/reproduces geometrically, and requires geometrically more resources to shelter and feed.
- lukeschlather 13y agoNo, they need to educate, shelter, and feed the poor of the world. Experience shows us that educated and healthy populations actually start to shrink as time goes on without intervention. You're making the mistake of assuming malice, while we're just talking about cold hard fact: people who amass a lot of power always lose it, if not by choice or natural death, then violently.
- frogpelt 13y ago"No one should have to do without" Do without what? What are people not able to get right now that they really need?