3 ms·
Exactly my arguments about CDR's, I have mixed feelings about disclosing location with CDR's - but if it were a landline, the location part is sort of a given,
by Aloha 13y ago
Exactly my arguments about CDR's, I have mixed feelings about disclosing location with CDR's - but if it were a landline, the location part is sort of a given, unless using a beige box or some other diverter like object (like a DISA on a PBX).
- maxerickson 13y agoAll you really said is that you were comfortable with things the way they are. I'd like to see some sort of data rights legislation, where when I ask the phone company to please try to connect me to some other person I can expect that they are minimizing access to those details. I wouldn't even mind if my requests related to service problems meant authorizing a period of wider disclosure. That at least changes the tone of the privacy discussions (and 'trusted third parties' are a well carved out aspect of privacy).
- Aloha 13y agoI'm uncomfortable with the way things are, I'd rather things be more like they were a decade (or more) ago, which is to say nearly universal access by law enforcement to call detail records on demand, these records might include location call is placed from (for both Mobile and Landline telephones), I'm also comfortable with disclosure of Text Messaging metadata (envelope information), but not Geolocation data attached to texts without a warrant. I'm deeply uncomfortable with anything beyond this - that includes but is not limited to geolocation data not tied to a voice call without a warrant, taps on IP/Text/Voice content without a warrant.