4 ms·
Correct. I largely hold position (a). I believe in position (b) as well, but there is a bar there, if something is above a certain level of invasion in invokes
by Aloha 13y ago
Correct. I largely hold position (a). I believe in position (b) as well, but there is a bar there, if something is above a certain level of invasion in invokes my belief in position (b) otherwise I consider it to be generally acceptable. Geolocation data is one of those things that invokes position (b) because I consider it to be an unreasonable invasion of privacy.
- jorgem 13y agoI just don't get it. Based on parent comments, you're ok with the government knowing WHO/WHEN you call someone. But you have a beef with the government knowing WHERE you called from? And your basis for that is that they've always been able to collect WHO/WHEN, but WHERE is different because it's new?
- Aloha 13y agoThe geolocation data is not tied to placing a call, the cell carriers keep and have a record wherever my mobile terminal is whenever its turned on and registered. Its tantamount to putting a GPS tracker on my person. This to me is a totally unreasonable encroachment on my right to privacy. The where attached to a placed call is a grey area for me. It's might be acceptable, it might not, because where is a given when using a landline.
- hbmnn 13y agoCool arbitrary line in the sand you're drawing there.
- Aloha 13y agoIt's not really arbitrary - its based on what kind of monitoring you could do on a traditional telephone.