5 ms·

Easiest acceptance testing framework I've used is Splinter. It's an abstraction layer over Selenium that practically makes writing tests similar to plain Englis

• croby 13y ago
  Very cool - looks to be a huge step in the right direction of abstracting away the complexities. I'll give it a deeper look - thanks!
• marekmroz 13y ago
  Admittedly, I only took a cursory look at Splinter, but in my opinion Robot Framework[1][2] is much closer to plain English. This can be good if you know what you're doing and can come up with consistent naming and test/keyword organization conventions, or bad if used by someone without basic understanding of a concept of a function, white space delimiters, etc. Still, it is super flexible, and I enjoyed using is a lot. Nice feature is having executable requirements if BDD is used. I.e. you can implement keywords to execute given-when-then req's and they became your test. [1](http://robotframework.org/ http://robotframework.org/) [2](http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/ http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/)
• stirno 13y ago
  Lots of good options in the space of 'friendly' wrappers around Selenium. For .NET users, FluentAutomation (http://fluent.stirno.com/ http://fluent.stirno.com/) is a good option. Works in regular tests or with scriptcs .csx files. Can automate any of the Se supported browsers, including PhantomJS very easily with short, readable commands.
• SEJeff 13y ago
  Absolutely love splinter! That being said, I implemented frame buffer support for both Firefox and chrome driver (for Linux clients) and saw phantomjs as unnecessary as a result.