where can i state that i am _offended_ -- extremely! -- by people who _choose_ to "be offended" unnecessarily, when absolutely no intention to offend is even ap

where can i state that i am _offended_ -- extremely! -- by people who _choose_ to "be offended" unnecessarily, when absolutely no intention to offend is even apparent? did you really, truly, honestly believe that that comment was a roundabout drive-by on mentally-challenged people? because frankly, that kind of uncomplimentary inference impugning someone else with unsavory motives is repugnant. i came here to say a dirt-simple "no thanks" to the idea, without commenting on it, because its stupidity was simply too obvious to require any statement. but that doesn't mean i believe kevin rose is "stupid", because i certainly don't. i can separate the idea from the person who suggested it. and if somebody else calls it a "retarded" idea, which is simply another way of saying that it is a _stupid_ idea, then i don't think they're criticizing kevin rose either, let alone a class as _remote_ as the mentally-challenged. retarded people can use lots of help. so give them some, instead of engaging other people in pointless semantics. because you're _not_ helping, or making anyone "think"... -bowerbird