4 ms·
Google is not violating anyone's privacy unless you've already decided they're guilty. Moreover, no one's forced to use google services. If anyone is violating
by patrickaljord 13y ago
Google is not violating anyone's privacy unless you've already decided they're guilty. Moreover, no one's forced to use google services. If anyone is violating people's privacy without their consents, it would be the government.
- gress 13y agoWhether Google is guilty or not has nothing to do with the seriousness of the accusation which the parent was trying to dismiss, and nowhere do I presume them guilty. However Google settled the same accusation by acknowledging the action and paying a fine to the FCC, so the only question is whether what they have done is illegal, not whether they did it. Directing attention to the government is a false dichotomy which makes it seem like you're trying to protect Google from scrutiny. Both can be guilty. We don't pardon thieves because they aren't as bad as murderers. Also nobody being forced to use google's services is irrelevant. The question is whether Google deceived those who did make that choice. If you think the best remedy is for users to make their own choice about using Google services, don't you want these behaviors to be exposed and publicly scrutinized so that users can make an informed decision?
- brainsic 13y agoFTC != FCC. Also Google didn't admit guilt in said settlement. It's not a question of deception, it's about a bug that was patched once disclosed with no indication to it being anything other than a mistake. It's a petty case brought by petty people, and your factless defence of their "cause" is puzzling.