6 ms·
I thought about and had to work with Mozilla today. "Seven years have passed without this bug being fixed." https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349259
by lovskogen 13y ago
I thought about and had to work with Mozilla today. "Seven years have passed without this bug being fixed." https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349259 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349259
- untog 13y agoI guess we should just give up on everything Mozilla does, then.
- Sssnake 13y agoDoing other things (that very few people are interested in or want) does not excuse having a broken browser stay unfixed for years. Firefox is well on its way to being the next IE6.
- oblio 13y agoIt's not always about what people are interested or want. Sometimes people give up on their long term interests for short term gain. Mozilla is about the long run. And if it weren't for Firefox, you'd still be developing for IE6. I'm sure that they care about those bugs, but right now the major battle for everyone is in the mobile platform area. If Firefox OS doesn't gain a foothold we're basically in walled garden area forever (even though Android is OSS I don't trust Google to not become reactionary once the market is saturated and Android dominates it; and through patents + branding Google can still prevent major forks if it wants to). So for your own long term sake, you'd better wish that they do make it, even if they have to postpone a few CSS bug fixes.
- Sssnake 13y agoMozilla is about the nothing. They are not about the long run, they are conceding control of the browser market to google. Firefox OS is never going to be relevant, will have no impact on phones, and doesn't help anyways. Phones are just computers, we would already have linux, netbsd and openbsd available for them if the hardware were documented. Making a bad OS out of a browser is not solving the problem, because the problem is closed hardware, not closed software. And no, firefox developers do not care about those bugs, they have been open for 7+ years.
- Aldo_MX 13y agoYou can always submit a patch, remember that the source is Open, and everyone is welcome to contribute. My cringe with Firefox are misfeatures like window.onbeforeunload. They deliberately break the expected behavior due to an unreasonable decision, but no browser is perfect.
- Skalman 13y agoThat patch would not be welcome. The patch to make the behavior intuitive is literally to remove "!important" from one CSS file. They're not changing because they're afraid to break the web.
- mburns 13y ago> They're afraid to break the web. They tried a fix and it broke YouTube. So it seems like a reasonable fear. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349259#c54 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349259#c54 > The patch ... is literally to remove "!important" from one CSS file It isn't a simple one line fix, as Firefox developer kindly explained. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349259#c76 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349259#c76 >That patch would not be welcome. They describe what work would be required (and where the changes would likely be) for the patch to be accepted in the bug. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349259#c80 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349259#c80
- Skalman 13y agoIt's a one-line fix to make it intuitive, but that's not what's needed here. Ultimately there should be some spec so that browser vendors can converge towards a single behavior.
- ancarda 13y ago>remember that the source is Open, and everyone is welcome to contribute. Problem is, not everybody knows C++. Having a bug open for 7 years makes me think the issue will never be resolved. All I can do is wait or use another browser. One annoyance I have with Firefox is the lack of built in keychain support. This really summarizes how I feel: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106400#c94 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106400#c94
- pwnna 13y ago15 years and counting! https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540
- untog 13y ago"Last year I asked for requirements that would lead to the successful closure of this bug. [...] I haven't heard back." If no one can even provide that...
- alexcabrera 13y agoIf you need that much styling control over a text area, using a content editable region and Javascript for the interaction is almost certainly a better option.
- drdaeman 13y agoAn even better option is to use emscripten to bundle custom HTML rendering engine that would draw styled text input using Wayland server running on <canvas>
- ehsanu1 13y agoYou kid, but despite how horrifying that is, something like it will probably end up happening.
- lovskogen 13y agoWhy not just CSS? All I want is to set the line-height.