4 ms·
> Snowden differs from many of the whistleblower ilk in that there is nothing to dislike about his character (yet). ... and because the leaks related to issues
by sheetjs 13y ago
> Snowden differs from many of the whistleblower ilk in that there is nothing to dislike about his character (yet).
... and because the leaks related to issues that outraged most people. It's easy to understand the concerns regarding spying, and most people have a visceral negative reaction. It's much more difficult to elicit that type of response to, say, human rights violations that don't directly affect most Americans.
In this case, I think that the media is siding with the people (more viewers / ad revenue). If this were any other type of leak, without the same populism, the media most likely wouldn't be as "friendly". There is dirt, but it hasn't been brought to light because it wouldn't sell well (who wants to bash the guy who told us that the NSA is spying on us?)
- lhc- 13y agoI'm not sure which media you are referring to as "friendly", but unless its the Guardian or some independent journalist, basically the entirely of establishment journalism is incredibly hostile towards Snowden and is siding completely with the USG. If they had dirt, they would release it immediately (notice how they parrot all the unsubstantiated claims of unnamed USG officals, for example).
- pantalaimon 13y agoMaybe he is not from the US.