He starts out by saying that Anarchism is a truism. That is, we by default live in Anarchism and cannot escape it. Then perhaps the discussion is really about

He starts out by saying that Anarchism is a truism. That is, we by default live in Anarchism and cannot escape it. Then perhaps the discussion is really about what the world should be like in the future. If the discussion brings together Anarcho-* of all sorts to dismantle the current regime, it would be time well spent. In the very least he helps us disassemble the (often conflicting) definitions so that we can better understand the origins and biases, thereby allowing us to reason more clearly about our reality. But yeah, I get your point.