5 ms·
Almost, but not quite. The difference would be that the US isn't killing civilians just for the sake of killing civilians to cause terror.
by ars_technician 13y ago
Almost, but not quite. The difference would be that the US isn't killing civilians just for the sake of killing civilians to cause terror.
- throwaway2048 13y agoThat is exactly what they are doing. Terrorism is all about relatively minor, cheap, covert strikes against somebody perceived as the enemy. The USA wont kill everyone that opposes them with such a campaign, but the point is the same as "terrorism", to send a message of fear if you dare oppose us, or associate with people who oppose us, damn the "collateral damage". Make no bones about it, this is exactly the same kind of asymmetrical warfare that the USA itself condemns as terrorism.
- kevando 13y agoI mean, yeah, that's what we're told. But the fact remains - drone strikes create terror. And on the other side, believing terrorist acts are simply to create terror is naive.