5 ms·
It's just going to be different dbs in the backend working with what they do best in tandem. Lucence base for search. RMDB for money/transactions. And other no
by digitalzombie 13y ago
It's just going to be different dbs in the backend working with what they do best in tandem.
Lucence base for search. RMDB for money/transactions. And other noSQL type for just data that isn't critical, don't care much about relation, and just need it to be fast.
Of course, perhaps PostgreSQL and other RMDB can have noSQL attributes then noSQL would have some good competition.
PostgreSQL if they can make it easier to clustered, like cassandra or elasticsearch. And get a better fuzzy string and other text search capability in there then now we're talking. But I guess it's just me dreaming.
- ddorian43 13y agopostgresql XC is master-master, shardable, cross-shard transactions, data partitioning across nodes, distributed queries
- aquadrop 13y agoYes, but it's side project so it doesn't get such attention\confidence as postgresql. But I hope the project won't get abandoned and will evolve into something very powerful.
- threeseed 13y agoIt's also not part of the mainline code base which gives it the impression of being unsupported and untrustworthy.
- perfmode 13y agoRMDB?
- threeseed 13y agoBy the sounds of it you don't understand how banks work today. They are eventually consistent and would work great with databases like Cassandra. And the growth of NoSQL today is in enterprises which are almost entirely mission critical. It's actually the smaller SQL databases (MySQL, PostgreSQL) that are being used for non mission critical uses.