4 ms·
I don't understand what is surprising or funny about that. It's pure Unix philosophy, different commands within a coherent management system. The opposite woul
by muyuu 13y ago
I don't understand what is surprising or funny about that. It's pure Unix philosophy, different commands within a coherent management system.
The opposite would be the surprising thing, this is not Windows. There are managers that do the whole thing in one single executable that calls others, even with GUIs etc, for dumb people.
- SamReidHughes 13y agoNo it's not, it's just how things turned out. The different commands have a whole bunch of separate options, and the fact that they turned out to be split upon certain lines isn't a reflection of some "philosophy". (Also, I'm glad you find it so easy to find ways to convince yourself you're not a dumb person.)
- muyuu 13y agohttp://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/36920/why-do-most-distros-other-than-debian-recommend-require-a-full-reinstall-when http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/36920/why-do-most-di... Debian is pretty much the only "major" distro that does sensible package management and history shows it just beats the rest at what it does. Other than Debian, I value Slackware because its approach works for what it does. These two make Gentoo and Arch pointless. Ubuntu and Mint work differently and with different goals. I can also rescue Puppy, SLAX, and Stalix. Rest I've tried are basically a waste of time and a result of not knowing what's out there combined with "Not Invented Here" syndrome.